Hello,
I've been developing a mac app built with Electron Builder. In August, I was successfully notarizing my app and able to send it to testers without them receiving a malware warning. I took a two month break. When I came back in October, I am not able to distribute my app without the malware warning.
I can't for the life of me figure out what I could be missing, unless my developer account was flagged by Apple for some reason. All the diagnostics I run on my app package show that it is properly signed, notarized, and stapled.
Here are some diagnostics I have run on the app:
Command: codesign -dv --verbose=4 "/Volumes/Form Desktop 1/Form.app"
Output:
Executable=/Volumes/Form Desktop 1/Form.app/Contents/MacOS/Form
Identifier=co.Form.desktop
Format=app bundle with Mach-O thin (arm64)
CodeDirectory v=20500 size=763 flags=0x10000(runtime) hashes=13+7 location=embedded
VersionPlatform=1
VersionMin=720896
VersionSDK=917504
Hash type=sha256 size=32
CandidateCDHash sha256=cedcaef933c003c01b4d9ef6925a413fe6b4a585
CandidateCDHashFull sha256=cedcaef933c003c01b4d9ef6925a413fe6b4a585bf61e19751e8158775600b00
Hash choices=sha256
CMSDigest=cedcaef933c003c01b4d9ef6925a413fe6b4a585bf61e19751e8158775600b00
CMSDigestType=2
Executable Segment base=0
Executable Segment limit=16384
Executable Segment flags=0x1
Page size=4096
CDHash=cedcaef933c003c01b4d9ef6925a413fe6b4a585
Signature size=8973
Authority=Developer ID Application: Jacob LEELAND (92D98F49FU)
Authority=Developer ID Certification Authority
Authority=Apple Root CA
Timestamp=Nov 14, 2025 at 8:25:09 PM
Notarization Ticket=stapled
Info.plist entries=30
TeamIdentifier=92D98F49FU
Runtime Version=14.0.0
Sealed Resources version=2 rules=13 files=35090
Internal requirements count=1 size=176
RESULT: ✅ SIGNED WITH DEVELOPER ID
✅ NOTARIZATION TICKET STAPLED
✅ HARDENED RUNTIME ENABLED
----------------------------------------------------------------
Command: spctl --assess --verbose=4 --type execute "/Volumes/Form Desktop 1/Form.app"
Output:
/Volumes/Form Desktop 1/Form.app: accepted
source=Notarized Developer ID
RESULT: ✅ GATEKEEPER ACCEPTS APPLICATION
----------------------------------------------------------------
Command: xattr -l "/Volumes/Form Desktop 1/Form.app"
Output:
(No extended attributes)
----------------------------------------------------------------
Command: stapler validate "/Volumes/Form Desktop 1/Form.app"
Output:
Processing: /Volumes/Form Desktop 1/Form.app
The validate action worked!
RESULT: ✅ NOTARIZATION TICKET VALID
[signing-verification-report.txt](https://developer.apple.com/forums/content/attachment/45b41936-6e7a-4f4f-8e80-bc1e3136c84e)
code-block
I have attached a more complete diagnostic text file as well. I have tried notarizing the .dmg in addition to the app bundle, but no combination seems to work as far as I can tell.
I appreciate any help or point in the right direction. I've wasted many days of development time on this, lol.
Demystify code signing and its importance in app development. Get help troubleshooting code signing issues and ensure your app is properly signed for distribution.
Selecting any option will automatically load the page
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
The problem is described in full with log output in #16844
We are having an issue with TCC prompting users for access to the app group container despite signing with entitlements following all guidelines.
This is a regression from the Feb 2025 Changes discussed in App Groups: macOS vs iOS: Working Towards Harmony
The problem can only be reproduced with Xcode 16.0 and later.
The entitlements for the app include access for the group container with
[Key] com.apple.security.application-groups
[Value]
[Array]
[String] G69SCX94XU.duck
The documentation notes the group name can be arbitrary, e.g. <team identifier>.<group name>. Cyberduck uses G69SCX94XU.duck by default. Interestingly enough the alert is not shown when a group name matching the bundle identifier is used, e.g. G69SCX94XU.ch.sudo.cyberduck.
During the release of our macOS App, we encountered the following issue:
We need to support dynamic code loading of WebAssembly (wasm) inside our App, mainly by loading WebAssembly (wasm) binary modules.
We discovered a problem: a wasm file is neither an executable nor a bundle, so it cannot be code-signed.
Since our App needs to pass notarization, we have not set the com.apple.security.cs.allow-unsigned-executable-memory entitlement.
Without setting com.apple.security.cs.allow-unsigned-executable-memory, loading a wasm module results in an “unsigned code” error that causes the process to crash.
Could you please advise on what we should do to avoid this problem? Is it possible to apply for a special entitlement to allow com.apple.security.cs.allow-unsigned-executable-memory?
Hi there,
We've discovered a problem with our iOS app. We've been attempting to add a Driverkit driver to it, but any time we run the app through Testflight, the driver installs fine, but when we go to enable the driver toggle in the app's settings, the toggle stays on, but in the device logs I can see:
could not insert bundle at <private> into manager: <private>
As you would expect - this means the driver is not actually enabled and does not respond to a device being connected to the iPad.
This does not happen when building & running the app locally, nor does it happen when installing an Ad Hoc build.
We also have a different app, not yet shipped. We are able to add the driver to that app without issue. It works after going through Testflight.
What we have discovered now is that everything works fine even if we just create an entirely new app with it's own bundle IDs. I should point out that in all cases, we're keeping the capabilities the same for each of these apps/IDs - including the managed capabilities.
The bundle IDs that have this problem are older (5 years old or more). It seems like any newer ID will work, but trying to add the driver (and the associated managed capabilities) to an older app/ID results in this vague error message, with no further details.
If we inspect the resulting dexts, we can also see that the "Internal requirements code size" is different on the ones that fail. The failing ones have a size of 204 bytes, whereas the working ones all have a size of 220 bytes. Not sure if that's related but it's strikingly consistent.
Does this mean there is an issue with older app IDs, and we need Apple to manually refresh them in some way before the driverkit capabilities will work after going through Testflight? We have two apps in this state, both are of the same vintage (~5 years+).
We've been battling this issue for months on and off, so would appreciate some help.
Hi,
I developed a Flutter app that works well in the iOS simulator, but that fails to deploy on my physical iPhone 13 Pro Max. Here is the error I get:
Target debug_unpack_ios failed: Exception: Failed to codesign /Users//Library/Developer/Xcode/DerivedData/Runner-/Build/Products/Debug-iphoneos/Flutter.framework/Flutter with identity
I've followed all the instructions that I found online, like moving my project from cloud storage to my local hard drive, but nothing has worked.
Thank you so much for your help!
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
General
I'm developing an app that receives push notifications, and writes the contents of the push notification to a shared location between the main app and a Notifications Message Extension, through App Groups. This all seems to work on my phone, with developer mode turned on, but when I archive my app as an Enterprise IPA and distribute it, the users can install the app on their phones and they receive the push notifications, but it doesn't appear that the message extension is running as my app displays the content of the shared data in the App Groups on the main screen and nothing is showing. I have tried on 3 phones, and it only works on the phone with developer mode turned on. I can't tell at this point whether it's because of a signing issue, or build phase order issue, or something else?
I’m facing an issue with my macOS app after code signing and notarization.
The app is signed with my Developer ID and notarized using xcrun notarytool. Everything works fine on the machine where the signing was done — Gatekeeper accepts it, no warning appears, and codesign/spctl checks pass.
However, when running the same .app on other Macs, users receive a Gatekeeper warning saying the app is "malicious software and cannot be opened". The signature is valid and the notarization log shows status: Accepted.
What I've tried:
Verified signature with codesign --verify --deep --strict --verbose=2
Checked notarization status via xcrun notarytool log
Assessed Gatekeeper trust with spctl --assess --type execute
Everything passes successfully on the development machine.
Why would the app be treated as malicious on other systems even after notarization?
I'm happy to share logs and technical details if needed.
I am responsible for the mobile app and thus also of the apple developer and app store connect accounts of a company.
An external freelancer developed a software package for us which we aim to offer for installation and use on macOS systems of our customers; distributed exclusively outside of the Apple App Store. The software package has nothing to do with the mobile app. MacOS' Gatekeeper currently warns or even prevents our customers regarding the installation of the package on their device; pretty much as described here: https://developer.apple.com/developer-id/.
According to a previous talk with Apple's Support, the software package (.app) the Freelancer developed must be signed with one of our own certificates. As we cannot grant selective app store connect access to third persons (only for the concerned certificates), we prefer to not provide access to our entire apple developer account to the freelancer, for the sole reason of the certificate & signing process. According to previous attempts with Apples' support regarding the most feasible solution in this case, they recommended me to manage the signing of the package of the freelancer, and simply request the package from the freelancer.
I've thus generated an according Developer ID Certificate, but regarding the signing process, I'm confused. I know how signing works with mobile apps in XCode, but regarding software that is not distributed throughout the App Store on macOS, I'm unsure about the process. Also, as far as I know, the entitlements of the application are involved in the signing process. So my concern is that simply having the software package (.app) from the freelancer is not really enough to complete the signing + notarization process? Won't I need further information about the app's entitlements etc.?
I would like to have a clear solution about the procedure that is required in these cases, as online documentations and / or forums as well as previous talks with your non-technical support from Apple did not resolve the issue.
I have a mac app which has a launch agent. I signed it with my account, but it always shows as my personal 'XX XXX" in the login items of mac settings. Actually this is the reason I switched my personal account to a company account. But now it is still shown as 'XX XXX' in the login items after I signed up again with this company account. Do you know how I can change this? The identity I also tried to create a new one with the team, but it does not allow me to create a new one. Chatgpt recommends revoking the current one, but this will affect our old release.
Hello,
I'm developing a feature for my app, that allows users to challenge their friends. The friend request functionality is built using Universal Links, but I've run into a significant issue.
The Universal Links are correctly deep-linking into the app. However, once the app opens, nothing happens—the friend request acceptance or rejection flow does not occur. This prevents users from completing friend requests and building their friend list.
Here are examples of the Universal Links I'm generating:
https://www.strike-force.app/invite?type=invite&amp;userID=...
https://www.strike-force.app/invite?type=invite&amp;friendRequestID=...
https://www.strike-force.app/profile?userID=...
I've recently updated my cloudflare-worker.js to serve a paths array of ["*"] in the AASA file, so I believe the links themselves should be valid.
Technical Details &amp; Error Logs
In the console, I am consistently seeing the following error message:
Cannot issue sandbox extension for URL:https://www.strike-force.app/invite?token=7EF1E439-090B-4DF2-BE64-9904F50A3F8B
Received port for identifier response: &lt;(null)&gt; with error:Error Domain=RBSServiceErrorDomain Code=1 "Client not entitled" UserInfo={RBSEntitlement=com.apple.runningboard.process-state, NSLocalizedFailureReason=Client not entitled, RBSPermanent=false} elapsedCPUTimeForFrontBoard couldn't generate a task port
This error appears to be related to entitlements and process state, but I am not sure if it's the root cause of the Universal Link issue or a separate problem. The 'Client not entitled' error on line 3 has had me chasing down entitlements issues. But, I've added the Associated Domains entitlement with the proper applink URLs and verified this in my Developer Portal. I've regenerated my provisioning profile, manually installed it, and selected/de-selected Automatically Manage Signing. As well I've verified my AASA file and it's correctly being served via HTTPS and returning a 200.
curl -i https://strike-force.app/.well-known/apple-app-site-association
curl -i https://www.strike-force.app/.well-known/apple-app-site-association
I am looking for guidance on why the friend request flow is not being triggered after a successful deep-link and how I can fix the related error.
Any insights or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Is it possible to have some additional content at
Versions/A/
in a macOS Framework bundle that is not in any of the standard folders? Will there be any side-effects during signing and notarization? The reason is it'd be a lot easier in my use case to be able to put content here instead of the Resources folder.
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
General
Hello,
We are experiencing an issue with the notarization queue and would appreciate your assistance.
A few days ago, we helped another team submit their app for notarization. However, that submission has been stuck in the “In Progress” state for about three days now. Unfortunately, this also seems to have caused our own team’s notarization requests to get stuck as well.
We ran the following command to review the submission history:
xcrun notarytool history --apple-id "xxx" --team-id "xxx" --password "xxx"
Successfully received submission history.
Partial results:
id: 0bafa66f-4f47-4327-811f-a05481be5d0b
status: In Progress
id: 2d00b75a-a17a-44fc-afa1-71e0e39ec2cd
status: In Progress
It appears that one of these belongs to another team’s app we helped submit, and the other is our own submission.
Both have remained In Progress for several days, and we are now unable to proceed with any new notarization requests.
Could you please help us clear or reset the stuck notarization queue so we can continue our submissions?
Thank you very much for your help!
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Notarization
I had submitted my app for notarization and it shows the below error -
"status": "Rejected",
"statusSummary": "Team is not yet configured for notarization. Please contact Developer Programs Support at developer.apple.com under the topic Development and Technical / Other Development or Technical Questions.",
"statusCode": 7000,
I have raised a ticket in the support but no reply yet.
Kindly help ASAP
I have a macOS app that captures screen images. The first time I run this application, a dialog is shown directing the user to give my app Screen Recording permission. Is there a way I can trigger this dialog earlier and detect whether the permission was granted?
I've successfully distributed a Java-based app .dmg from my intel iMac, but am trying to port over the signing authority ( Certificate and Identity) to an M2.
I'm following the "backup your Identities" recipe to make a .p12 file, but I can't complete the Export. The .p12 file format option is greyed out (while .pem and .cer are offered).
What could be causing this? I can sign my .dmg installers from this computer, so codesign is happy with what it is seeing in the Keychain.
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Certificates, Identifiers & Profiles
Hello Engineers
My app was rejected with the message below, BUT I don't have this entitlements in my project! I already removed all Xcode files under ${HOME}/Developer/Xcode, but the problem still alive!
Guideline 2.4.5(i) - Performance
In order to continue reviewing your app, we require additional information.
Your app uses one or more entitlements which do not appear to have matching functionality within the app. Please reply to this message in App Store Connect and describe how and where the app uses the following entitlements. You will not need to upload a new binary to provide this information.
Apps should have only the minimum set of entitlements necessary for the app to function properly. If there are entitlements that are not needed, please remove them and submit an updated binary. You will need to Developer Reject the app to upload an updated version.
"com.apple.security.assets.pictures.read-write"
"com.apple.security.assets.movies.read-write"
"com.apple.security.assets.music.read-write"
"com.apple.security.files.downloads.read-write"
Here my entitlements:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
<plist version="1.0">
<dict>
<key>com.apple.security.app-sandbox</key>
<true/>
<key>com.apple.security.application-groups</key>
<array>
<string>group.org.eof.apps</string>
</array>
<key>com.apple.security.files.user-selected.read-write</key>
<true/>
</dict>
</plist>
code-block
Who or where are these entitlements inserted?
Which button should be clicked to deactivate them?
Link to my project:
DRFXBuilder
Regards
Hi Developers,
I'm encountering persistent validation errors in Xcode 16.3 (16E140) on macOS 15.4.1 (24E263) with M1 when archiving and distributing a macOS app (Developer ID signing + notarization).
App Structure:
A native Swift/Obj-C wrapper app that launches a nested .app inside its Resources.
The nested app is built with PyInstaller and includes:
A Python core
Custom C++ binaries
Many bundled .so libraries (e.g., from OpenCV, PyQt/PySide)
Issues During Validation:
App Sandbox Not Enabled
Error: App Sandbox missing for NestedApp.app/Contents/MacOS/NestedExecutable.
Question: For Developer ID (not App Store), is sandboxing strictly required for nested PyInstaller apps? If the wrapper is sandboxed, must the nested app be as well? Given the PyInstaller app's nature (requiring broad system access), how should entitlements be managed?
Upload Symbols Failed
Errors for missing .dSYM files for:
The nested app’s executable
Custom C++ binaries
.so files (OpenCV, PyQt, etc.)
These are either third-party or built without DWARF data, making .dSYM generation impractical post-build.
Question: Are these symbol errors critical for Developer ID notarization (not App Store)? Can notarization succeed despite them? Is lack of symbol upload a known limitation with PyInstaller apps? Any best practices?
Hello Apple Support,
While attempting to staple a notarization ticket for our signed installer package, the stapler command fails with Error 65. Upon investigation, we found that connections to oscdn.apple.com present an SSL certificate issued to a248.e.akamai.net, which does not include oscdn.apple.com in its Subject Alternative Name (SAN).
This mismatch prevents our macOS environment from validating tickets and completing the stapling process.
Steps tried:
Verified notarization status (Accepted).
DNS flushed, tried different DNS (8.8.8.8, 1.1.1.1).
curl to oscdn.apple.com consistently fails with SSL error 60.
Please advise on resolving this certificate mismatch.
also when I try to run the stapler command with my pkg
"xcrun stapler staple/Users/mactest/Desktop/IPMPlus_Macos_Installer.signed.pkg"
getting the output like :-
Processing: /Users/mactest/Desktop/IPMPlus_Macos_Installer.signed.pkg
Could not validate ticket for /Users/mac-test/Desktop/IPMPlus_Macos_Installer.signed.pkg
The staple and validate action failed! Error 65.
please help
Thank you.
Is there a way to check your app signature to verify if any one has tampered with the ipa file. I want to know specifically how to determine and handle this type of situation. How can i do a check for this in code(swift).
Hello everyone,
I’m trying to notarize my macOS app (DockIt.zip) using the new notarytool CLI, but every submission remains in In Progress status forever, it never moves to Accepted or Rejected. I’ve tried multiple rebuilds, credential resets, and even the Xcode GUI method, but the result is the same.
Environment
• macOS 14.x
• Xcode 15.x / Command-Line Tools 15.x
• Apple ID: afonsocruz.dev@icloud.com (Team ID: 264Z9XKCT6)
• Keychain profile: DockItCreds
Steps taken
1. zip -r DockIt.zip DockIt.app
2. xcrun notarytool store-credentials DockItCreds --apple-id ... --team-id 264Z9XKCT6
3. xcrun notarytool submit DockIt.zip --keychain-profile DockItCreds --wait
4. xcrun notarytool history --keychain-profile DockItCreds
History snapshot
167a9600-5c7c-4bc4-b984-dd967d30e161 (2025-05-19T11:37:59Z) – In Progress
7167f7c8-d448-4b35-9817-055009f2730a (2025-05-19T04:59:34Z) – In Progress
6ef0610a-595f-4c57-b0f2-f5fe783e8679 (2025-05-18T22:04:10Z) – In Progress
bddde388-a34a-42c4-afb8-f06f2b0fe8fa (2025-05-17T10:24:07Z) – In Progress
Questions
Is it normal to stay “In Progress” for so long?
Any recent service changes or outages?
How can I get more detailed logs?
Also, I'm still learning about macOS development and these steps! If there's something obvious and I was not able to see, please, take into consideration!
Thanks!
Topic:
Code Signing
SubTopic:
Notarization